<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Clearance Jobs Blog &#187; Cybersecurity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/category/cybersecurity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com</link>
	<description>Defense jobs, security clearance jobs, and intelligence jobs, industry news, and security clearance advice for the security cleared professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ask Your Clearance Questions &#8211; Part 23</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/ask-your-clearance-questions-part-23/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ask-your-clearance-questions-part-23</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/ask-your-clearance-questions-part-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClearanceJobsTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getting/Updating a Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security-Cleared Career Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security clearance questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF86]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our popular ongoing series allows you to ask your most complex questions regarding security clearances and our regular contributors of present and former clearance investigators and adjudicators will try to answer them. The rules are listed below. Failure to abide by them will mean your question will be deleted. NOTE: Due to the volume of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/ask-your-clearance-questions-part-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>186</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Agenda at IMPACT 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/on-the-agenda-at-impact-2011/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-the-agenda-at-impact-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/on-the-agenda-at-impact-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindy Kyzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security clearance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMPACT 2011 took place in Chantilly, Va. this week and while the event was off-the-record, it’s worth reporting the hot topics discussed in this gathering of security officers and experts. With hundreds of Facility Security Officers and Information System Security Officers in attendance the forum was a hot venue for information sharing and discussion of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/on-the-agenda-at-impact-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IACP/PERSEREC Cybervetting Report</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/iacpperserec-cybervetting-report/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=iacpperserec-cybervetting-report</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/iacpperserec-cybervetting-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybervetting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 30, 2010 the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) released a report on their yearlong study of police cybervetting policy, “Developing a Cybervetting Strategy for Law Enforcement.” The report was a collaborative effort by the IACP and the Defense Personnel Security Research Center (PERSEREC). The report states that: Using the Internet to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/iacpperserec-cybervetting-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networking: The Good, The Bad, &amp; The Ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/social-networking-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=social-networking-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/social-networking-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pecinovsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security clearance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Secretary Gates said the &#8220;freedom of communication and the nature of it is a huge strategic asset for the United States&#8230;there are clearly a number of governments, around the world, that try to control these communications&#8230;but these governments &#8220;can&#8217;t draw the net tight enough to stop everything&#8221;&#8230; However, the DOD also warns against the dark [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/social-networking-the-good-the-bad-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIA Investing in Company to Monitor Your Blog and Tweets?</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/cia-investing-in-company-to-monitor-your-blog-and-tweets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cia-investing-in-company-to-monitor-your-blog-and-tweets</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/cia-investing-in-company-to-monitor-your-blog-and-tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Lesser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per this new article on Wired, the CIA is using its relationship with In-Q-Tel to buy into a company called Visible Technologies. Visible Technologies is a software company that specializes in monitoring the social web, including Twitter, blogs, Facebook, YouTube, and others. In-Q-Tel says it wants Visible to keep track of foreign social media, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/cleared-news/cia-investing-in-company-to-monitor-your-blog-and-tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Teleworking Speed Up the Security Clearance Process?</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/did-teleworking-speed-up-the-security-clearance-process/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=did-teleworking-speed-up-the-security-clearance-process</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/did-teleworking-speed-up-the-security-clearance-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pecinovsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearance process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week during the Telework Exchange Town Hall Meeting, OPM Director John Berry credited the approx. 5,000 investigators who worked from home in reducing the average time needed for a security clearance investigation from a year in &#8217;01 to 37 days. The Department of Defense (DoD) had the greatest number (16,871)  of employees teleworking. Although [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/did-teleworking-speed-up-the-security-clearance-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shortage of Computer Experts Hinder Cyber-Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/security-cleared-career-advice/shortage-of-computer-experts-hinder-cyber-defense/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=shortage-of-computer-experts-hinder-cyber-defense</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/security-cleared-career-advice/shortage-of-computer-experts-hinder-cyber-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security-Cleared Career Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Washington Post article on June 24, 2009 reported the planned establishment of a Department of Defense (DoD) Cyber-Defense Command by October 2009 with full operational capability by October 2010. The Cyber-Defense Command&#8217;s mission will be to defend military networks, but will assist federal civilian networks. But a July 22, 2009 Associated Press article reported [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/security-cleared-career-advice/shortage-of-computer-experts-hinder-cyber-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classified Teleworking</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/classified-teleworking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=classified-teleworking</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/classified-teleworking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pecinovsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the fiscal 2010 Defense appropriations bill a test program aims to set up a secure telework site in the D.C. metro area for federal employees who need to access classified networks. Nextgov reports that at least two sites in the D.C. area will be identified where they can test the efficacy of a secure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/classified-teleworking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Revelations Regarding Falsified Security Checks</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/more-revelations-regarding-falsified-security-checks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-revelations-regarding-falsified-security-checks</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/more-revelations-regarding-falsified-security-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getting/Updating a Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security-Cleared Career Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearance process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal investigative services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF86]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a May 25, 2009 article at FederalTimes.com, â€œFifty-three federal and contractor falsified security clearance background investigations since 2005. . . . All of them have either been fired or left their jobs, and six were prosecuted within the last year for criminal misconduct.â€ The investigators worked directly or indirectly for the Federal Investigative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/more-revelations-regarding-falsified-security-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit Repair or Scam?</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/credit-repair-or-scam/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=credit-repair-or-scam</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/credit-repair-or-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getting/Updating a Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security-Cleared Career Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearance process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security clearance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worried about being denied a security clearance because of bad credit? Considering a credit repair company to fix your credit report? In an AARP Bulletin Today Scam Alert article, Credit Repair&#8217;s Dirty Business, Steven Baker of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was quoted as saying, â€œIn the last year, we&#8217;ve seen an increase of 50 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/credit-repair-or-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workers Notified After SRA Virus Breach</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/workers-notified-after-sra-virus-breach/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=workers-notified-after-sra-virus-breach</link>
		<comments>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/workers-notified-after-sra-virus-breach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleared News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A FCW.com article on the 4 Feb 09 has confirmed that SRA International&#8216;s computer network was infected by a virus, which may have exposed a number of federal employees&#8217; personal information. &#8220;The breached information could include names, addresses, dates of birth, health information and Social Security numbers. Personal company computers with data from questionnaires related [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-jobs/workers-notified-after-sra-virus-breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

