<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clearance Applications Not Processed Within Target Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/gettingupdating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times</link>
	<description>Defense jobs, security clearance jobs, and intelligence jobs, industry news, and security clearance advice for the security cleared professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-27942</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-27942</guid>
		<description>Hello everyone.  I have a situation that I hope someone can help me with.  I am an OPM/FISD agent and recently received word that on two of my cases that were reviewed the records that I obtained and reported on those cases are being questioned for an integrity/falsafication issue.  The record providers are saying that they did not provide the record when they actually did and I reoprted it.  OPM is also  saying that my telephone testimonies were too high and a few people claimed they were not given a choice of in person or by telephone, which I clearly did ask at the very start of the call after the privacy act.  

Has anyone been investigated for similar stuff and if so what was the process and what can I expect?  I am not sleeping, eating or able to focus.  The anticipation of the outcome is killing me.  I was notified over a month ago this investigation was being conducted when I had my spin done.  No word since then.  Any help would be really appreciated.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone.  I have a situation that I hope someone can help me with.  I am an OPM/FISD agent and recently received word that on two of my cases that were reviewed the records that I obtained and reported on those cases are being questioned for an integrity/falsafication issue.  The record providers are saying that they did not provide the record when they actually did and I reoprted it.  OPM is also  saying that my telephone testimonies were too high and a few people claimed they were not given a choice of in person or by telephone, which I clearly did ask at the very start of the call after the privacy act.  </p>
<p>Has anyone been investigated for similar stuff and if so what was the process and what can I expect?  I am not sleeping, eating or able to focus.  The anticipation of the outcome is killing me.  I was notified over a month ago this investigation was being conducted when I had my spin done.  No word since then.  Any help would be really appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-26845</link>
		<dc:creator>Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-26845</guid>
		<description>USIS was a very good company to work for in the late 1990&#039;s early 2000&#039;s. The management was proactive and wanted to work hard to produce a good product and make money for the shareholders (the employees). In 2001 when DOD started dumping cases on OPM/USIS, all hell broke loose. USIS was not able to keep up with the amount of work that was coming through the door. In addition the contract USIS signed with OPM which gave USIS the entire contract for five years, was coming up for re-bid. Uncle Phil was able to re-bid the contract and promptly sold the company to Welsh Carson in 2003. 

From this point the company started going down hill. With the sale of the company, most of the senior managers retired. This left a vacum of qualified people in mamagement positions. USIS started putting people with little or no management experience into these slots making decision that affected the lives of people who have been doing this job for years. (This caused major Problems) I worked for USIS from 1999 to 2003. I converted to a contractor the day after I received my check from the ESOP. I still have lots of friends in the field, either with USIS or with Kroll. (since they are the only ones left) My advice to anyone thinking about going to work for any contractor is dont! If you are serious about being an investigator, this is not the place for you. As a contractor you are a fact checker and that is it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USIS was a very good company to work for in the late 1990&#8242;s early 2000&#8242;s. The management was proactive and wanted to work hard to produce a good product and make money for the shareholders (the employees). In 2001 when DOD started dumping cases on OPM/USIS, all hell broke loose. USIS was not able to keep up with the amount of work that was coming through the door. In addition the contract USIS signed with OPM which gave USIS the entire contract for five years, was coming up for re-bid. Uncle Phil was able to re-bid the contract and promptly sold the company to Welsh Carson in 2003. </p>
<p>From this point the company started going down hill. With the sale of the company, most of the senior managers retired. This left a vacum of qualified people in mamagement positions. USIS started putting people with little or no management experience into these slots making decision that affected the lives of people who have been doing this job for years. (This caused major Problems) I worked for USIS from 1999 to 2003. I converted to a contractor the day after I received my check from the ESOP. I still have lots of friends in the field, either with USIS or with Kroll. (since they are the only ones left) My advice to anyone thinking about going to work for any contractor is dont! If you are serious about being an investigator, this is not the place for you. As a contractor you are a fact checker and that is it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-22924</link>
		<dc:creator>William Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-22924</guid>
		<description>Joelle:
Bob is misinformed about why you will or will not be issued a security clearance.  No one pays for security clearances; they pay for investigations.  All federal investigators must have a favorably adjudicated SSBI because they occupy critical-sensitive positions, not because they require a security clearance.  By extension this also applies to federal contract investigators.  Whether or not you are granted a security clearance depends entirely on your need for a clearance.  This is also true of OPM FISD investigators and other federal investigators.

Having a favorably adjudicated SSBI is just as good as having a TS clearance when you go looking elsewhere for employment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joelle:<br />
Bob is misinformed about why you will or will not be issued a security clearance.  No one pays for security clearances; they pay for investigations.  All federal investigators must have a favorably adjudicated SSBI because they occupy critical-sensitive positions, not because they require a security clearance.  By extension this also applies to federal contract investigators.  Whether or not you are granted a security clearance depends entirely on your need for a clearance.  This is also true of OPM FISD investigators and other federal investigators.</p>
<p>Having a favorably adjudicated SSBI is just as good as having a TS clearance when you go looking elsewhere for employment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joelle</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-22434</link>
		<dc:creator>Joelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-22434</guid>
		<description>After working for USIS for a year or however long do you think a company would be more willing to hire me and sponsor my security clearance based on the fact that I have worked with USIS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After working for USIS for a year or however long do you think a company would be more willing to hire me and sponsor my security clearance based on the fact that I have worked with USIS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob(Former USIS Investigator)</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-22120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob(Former USIS Investigator)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-22120</guid>
		<description>Joelle,  
  Those Credit card debts should not have a Negative Impact on the Adjudication of Your Position at USIS.  Just be Honest on the E-QIP and with your Investigator and everything should be ok.  As far as having a SECRET OR TOP SECRET security clearance as an Investigator the answer is NEGATIVE.  You will not be given a SECRET or TOP SECRET security clerance by OPM or the Department of Defense or by any other Government agency to perform your duties as an Investigator working on the OPM contract.  Makes sense? Definitely not.  The Reason why USIS does not pay for you to have your Clearance is because if they did that then their Attrition level would be worse than it already is because everyone would work for USIS just to get the clearance and quit for a more lucrative paying postion and a signing Bonus at a Government Agency or a Contractor after 2 months of employment.  If I was the CEO of USIS I would do the same thing.  Its just Business, don&#039;t take it personal. If I were you I would work for USIS for 1 year then become a contractor AND Start your own S-Corporation and contract out with the other OPM contractors.  You will make twice as much without all the Red tape.

Take care and good luck! 

Just some food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joelle,<br />
  Those Credit card debts should not have a Negative Impact on the Adjudication of Your Position at USIS.  Just be Honest on the E-QIP and with your Investigator and everything should be ok.  As far as having a SECRET OR TOP SECRET security clearance as an Investigator the answer is NEGATIVE.  You will not be given a SECRET or TOP SECRET security clerance by OPM or the Department of Defense or by any other Government agency to perform your duties as an Investigator working on the OPM contract.  Makes sense? Definitely not.  The Reason why USIS does not pay for you to have your Clearance is because if they did that then their Attrition level would be worse than it already is because everyone would work for USIS just to get the clearance and quit for a more lucrative paying postion and a signing Bonus at a Government Agency or a Contractor after 2 months of employment.  If I was the CEO of USIS I would do the same thing.  Its just Business, don&#8217;t take it personal. If I were you I would work for USIS for 1 year then become a contractor AND Start your own S-Corporation and contract out with the other OPM contractors.  You will make twice as much without all the Red tape.</p>
<p>Take care and good luck! </p>
<p>Just some food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joelle</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-21662</link>
		<dc:creator>Joelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-21662</guid>
		<description>I just got a job as an investigator with USIS...I have some negative stuff on my credit report such as...in college I got into some credit card debt...it is now COMPLETELY paid off...I did do settlements on a few of the cards...but I owe nothing (they are just still on my report). Will this stop my clearance from going through? 

Also, I forgot to ask but as a new investigator is your clearance TS or Secret?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a job as an investigator with USIS&#8230;I have some negative stuff on my credit report such as&#8230;in college I got into some credit card debt&#8230;it is now COMPLETELY paid off&#8230;I did do settlements on a few of the cards&#8230;but I owe nothing (they are just still on my report). Will this stop my clearance from going through? </p>
<p>Also, I forgot to ask but as a new investigator is your clearance TS or Secret?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senior Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-17560</link>
		<dc:creator>Senior Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-17560</guid>
		<description>I was an Investigator with USIS from 4/02 to 8/07 at which time a false complaint was filed and eventually I was terminated. My concern in NOT with USIS, rather with OPM. After being suspended without being informed why, an OPM/FIS agent conducted an &quot;investigation&quot; that took him 4 weeks to complete. He interviewed me, 4 biased sources and obtained 2 records. With USIS stat requirements he should have completed the investigation in 2 days. If his performance was any example of the complacency and laziness mentioned by other posters, it is no wonder security clearances are lagging. OPM never informed me why I was suspended and they sent a vague letter informing that I must be removed from the OPM contract. AFter several months I still have received no letters stating specifically why I was terminated and no information regarding an appeal. OPM will not tell USIS why they terminated employees due to &quot;privacy concerns&quot; unless the reason is falsification and then USIS has to rework all of that investigator&#039;s cases. All of these contractors, USIS, CACI, MSM, KROLL, are at the mercy of OPM and their ineffective agents. It is frightening to see first hand what happens when a complaint is made and how poorly the ensuing investigation is handled by OPM/FIS agents. I am currently trying to learn how to appeal. The investigator position is not for everyone, but I was lucky to have a good DM and be treated fairly by USIS with regard to raises, etc. I also received money when the ESOP was cashed in. Hopefully the company cars and the financial maneuvering by the new management will pay off with an IPO...a least that&#039;s why they claim they are putting us through all of these changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was an Investigator with USIS from 4/02 to 8/07 at which time a false complaint was filed and eventually I was terminated. My concern in NOT with USIS, rather with OPM. After being suspended without being informed why, an OPM/FIS agent conducted an &#8220;investigation&#8221; that took him 4 weeks to complete. He interviewed me, 4 biased sources and obtained 2 records. With USIS stat requirements he should have completed the investigation in 2 days. If his performance was any example of the complacency and laziness mentioned by other posters, it is no wonder security clearances are lagging. OPM never informed me why I was suspended and they sent a vague letter informing that I must be removed from the OPM contract. AFter several months I still have received no letters stating specifically why I was terminated and no information regarding an appeal. OPM will not tell USIS why they terminated employees due to &#8220;privacy concerns&#8221; unless the reason is falsification and then USIS has to rework all of that investigator&#8217;s cases. All of these contractors, USIS, CACI, MSM, KROLL, are at the mercy of OPM and their ineffective agents. It is frightening to see first hand what happens when a complaint is made and how poorly the ensuing investigation is handled by OPM/FIS agents. I am currently trying to learn how to appeal. The investigator position is not for everyone, but I was lucky to have a good DM and be treated fairly by USIS with regard to raises, etc. I also received money when the ESOP was cashed in. Hopefully the company cars and the financial maneuvering by the new management will pay off with an IPO&#8230;a least that&#8217;s why they claim they are putting us through all of these changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-17432</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-17432</guid>
		<description>to jonathan:

THANK YOU...  and AMEN!
When I was in training I had wondered why it seemed that everyone that worked for USIS had only been with the company for a few years.  I got the answer to my qeustion after about 6 months on the job.  Also, to the metrics response.  Agree fully.  If you are an investigator that has a 150 mile radius and has to drive 2.5 hours one way just to conduct a spin and turnaround the next day and drive 2 (one way)to obtain a specific release..  Well lets do the math. 18 moc for spin and 3 moc for a relese. And you have just blown 9 hours in obtaining 21 MOC. It may be easier for investigators to knock out there mocs if you only have to drive 30 minutes per day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to jonathan:</p>
<p>THANK YOU&#8230;  and AMEN!<br />
When I was in training I had wondered why it seemed that everyone that worked for USIS had only been with the company for a few years.  I got the answer to my qeustion after about 6 months on the job.  Also, to the metrics response.  Agree fully.  If you are an investigator that has a 150 mile radius and has to drive 2.5 hours one way just to conduct a spin and turnaround the next day and drive 2 (one way)to obtain a specific release..  Well lets do the math. 18 moc for spin and 3 moc for a relese. And you have just blown 9 hours in obtaining 21 MOC. It may be easier for investigators to knock out there mocs if you only have to drive 30 minutes per day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-16424</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-16424</guid>
		<description>This is to S.K. in particular, I want to respond to each and every point that you made in your glowing defense of USIS. First, you said that all of us who were critical of USIS, knew exactly what we were getting into. YOU are the one who doesnt know what you are talking about. I began with USIS in 08/02, there was no company car, the pay structure was different and those promises for increases did not materialize. I was well aware of the hours I would need to work and I never complained about that, I did work overtime. I was with USIS for nearly 5 years, I left in 05/07 and things changed which I did not sign on for initially. I dont know how old you are, but I guarantee, that you will not stay there long as you will fast realize that the other companies on the OPM contract pay far better than does USIS. You said that to work for OPM directly was the best thing next to USIS, who told you to say that Randy Dobbs. I have news for you, when I hired in with USIS in 08/02, they did 90%+ of the work on the OPM contract, this is no longer the case. They now have about 60% to 65% of the work on the contract. That may seem like a lot, however they lost that much work or more when the contract was rebid in 2004, did YOU know that or did your management tell you that? The other companies on the contract KROLL and CACI pay much better than USIS and they are much larger companies, who are expanding in this area, so in 2009, when the contrat is rebid, I promise you, USIS will not have over 50% of the OPM contract.  To those of us who worked for a long time with USIS, unlike you, and are now working with other companies on the OPM contract and making more MONEY, it is evident that you dont know what you are talking about. I would also like to say a bit about the co. car program. The program was begun in 11/06, and those of us who were employees at that time were given until march 07 to either drive the co car or take a reduced mileage reimbursement of 30 cents per mile. I know people personally in my district who left the company over the co car program, and they were experienced investigators 3+ years or more, were you at USIS in 11/06, hmmm? I know plenty of people who were only told about the co car program about 2 months before it came about, now if you just bought a new car, mine was less than a year old and you are making payments on that car and then this co car comes out and takes $145 montly out of your paycheck, it hurts.

When you say USIS has outstanding performance, who are you kidding. I as a contract investigator w CACI have been working the same type of cases as before and have worked pieces of cases left by USIS investigators. If USIS is so great on performance why is their reputation so bad with other investigators and with govt agencies I deal with?

1)Why has OPM given more of the investigative contract to its direct competitors?
2)Are you working on any of these new contracts they have acquired?
3)Why does USIS, have reviewers who work for USIS reviewing the work of fieldwork done by its own investigators? See any conflict there?

And you talk about metrics, that is not how you measure whether an investigator is good or bad. I didn&#039;t care how many testimonies per day, items per hour, test per week or months of coverage I completed. I got my work done and if that didnt measure up to these stupid stats then I was fussed at. Let me tell you one thing, I am paid now on the cases I complete, my supervisor doesnt care about the stats because I get the work done. So, the whole metrics thing is just a load of BS.

I am thankful that I got experience at USIS, but dont you think for one minute that most other former employees of USIS, buy the stuff you said and if you bother to listen and talk to your co-workers, I bet that they wouldn&#039;t buy it either. And I am talking about those that have been there longer than you.

And I dont know who is lower than USIS in the field of investigations. It certainly isnt CACI (I work for them) nor KROLL (three former co-workers of mine work there and they make much more at KROLL). I am about to start with MSM Security and they dont make less than USIS. Why dont you say which company pays it s investigators less. I would love to know.

I&#039;m sorry if it made you sad to read these posts, but ask yourself do you think that everyone who posted here is an angry former employee who is lying. What has been said in the blogs about USIS is the truth, your view is the distinct minority on this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is to S.K. in particular, I want to respond to each and every point that you made in your glowing defense of USIS. First, you said that all of us who were critical of USIS, knew exactly what we were getting into. YOU are the one who doesnt know what you are talking about. I began with USIS in 08/02, there was no company car, the pay structure was different and those promises for increases did not materialize. I was well aware of the hours I would need to work and I never complained about that, I did work overtime. I was with USIS for nearly 5 years, I left in 05/07 and things changed which I did not sign on for initially. I dont know how old you are, but I guarantee, that you will not stay there long as you will fast realize that the other companies on the OPM contract pay far better than does USIS. You said that to work for OPM directly was the best thing next to USIS, who told you to say that Randy Dobbs. I have news for you, when I hired in with USIS in 08/02, they did 90%+ of the work on the OPM contract, this is no longer the case. They now have about 60% to 65% of the work on the contract. That may seem like a lot, however they lost that much work or more when the contract was rebid in 2004, did YOU know that or did your management tell you that? The other companies on the contract KROLL and CACI pay much better than USIS and they are much larger companies, who are expanding in this area, so in 2009, when the contrat is rebid, I promise you, USIS will not have over 50% of the OPM contract.  To those of us who worked for a long time with USIS, unlike you, and are now working with other companies on the OPM contract and making more MONEY, it is evident that you dont know what you are talking about. I would also like to say a bit about the co. car program. The program was begun in 11/06, and those of us who were employees at that time were given until march 07 to either drive the co car or take a reduced mileage reimbursement of 30 cents per mile. I know people personally in my district who left the company over the co car program, and they were experienced investigators 3+ years or more, were you at USIS in 11/06, hmmm? I know plenty of people who were only told about the co car program about 2 months before it came about, now if you just bought a new car, mine was less than a year old and you are making payments on that car and then this co car comes out and takes $145 montly out of your paycheck, it hurts.</p>
<p>When you say USIS has outstanding performance, who are you kidding. I as a contract investigator w CACI have been working the same type of cases as before and have worked pieces of cases left by USIS investigators. If USIS is so great on performance why is their reputation so bad with other investigators and with govt agencies I deal with?</p>
<p>1)Why has OPM given more of the investigative contract to its direct competitors?<br />
2)Are you working on any of these new contracts they have acquired?<br />
3)Why does USIS, have reviewers who work for USIS reviewing the work of fieldwork done by its own investigators? See any conflict there?</p>
<p>And you talk about metrics, that is not how you measure whether an investigator is good or bad. I didn&#8217;t care how many testimonies per day, items per hour, test per week or months of coverage I completed. I got my work done and if that didnt measure up to these stupid stats then I was fussed at. Let me tell you one thing, I am paid now on the cases I complete, my supervisor doesnt care about the stats because I get the work done. So, the whole metrics thing is just a load of BS.</p>
<p>I am thankful that I got experience at USIS, but dont you think for one minute that most other former employees of USIS, buy the stuff you said and if you bother to listen and talk to your co-workers, I bet that they wouldn&#8217;t buy it either. And I am talking about those that have been there longer than you.</p>
<p>And I dont know who is lower than USIS in the field of investigations. It certainly isnt CACI (I work for them) nor KROLL (three former co-workers of mine work there and they make much more at KROLL). I am about to start with MSM Security and they dont make less than USIS. Why dont you say which company pays it s investigators less. I would love to know.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if it made you sad to read these posts, but ask yourself do you think that everyone who posted here is an angry former employee who is lying. What has been said in the blogs about USIS is the truth, your view is the distinct minority on this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-16040</link>
		<dc:creator>S.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-16040</guid>
		<description>I have worked for USiS for a year and one half, now.  After reading your blog, I have come to the conclusion that everybody likes to complain about certain aspects of the company that were presented in black and white before he or she even accepted the position as an investigator.  The company car, the pay, the hours- those were all presented prior to receiving a face-to-face interview (this included the one-year contract).  I believe that everybody needs to remember that nothing in life is for free.  Yes, like any job, there are aspects that could improve the life of a field investigator with USiS.  The life of a field investigator is not easy:  You have to be self-motivated, a strong listener and writer, intunitive, and willing to go the extra mile.  Yes, the pay is not as high as some jobs (especially in the area in which I work), but it&#039;s not the lowest on the market, either.  Each and every employee starts at the same base pay, based on one&#039;s geographical location.  Most employees can expect a pretty decent pay increase (I am only speaking from the experience I have had with my particular district) within one year.  Would I love to make more money?  Of course.  Who wouldn&#039;t?  There are opportunities for overtime; however, it has to be productive work.  

The role of an investigator compared to that of an &quot;office job&quot; is that the time that you &quot;work&quot; is really that- it&#039;s total productive time.  Most &quot;office workers&quot; are able to charge a full day&#039;s work without really doing so.  The role of an investigator is not so- it does not allow one to slack off, because then your metrics will reflect this.

Are the metrics stressful?  Yes, they can be.  I live in one of the busiest areas for security clearances- the Washington, D.C. area.  Our metrics are perhaps the highest for any investigators within the United States.  Are they attainable?  Of course.  It&#039;s not impossible to make one&#039;s statistics if he or she is really working the full forty hours.  And not everything is based on stats; there are certain cases that require more time.

For me, USiS is perhaps not a company I&#039;d like to remain at until I retire (being that I am very young and hope to eventually &quot;move up&quot; in the investigative world)... however, it&#039;s probably the most stable government contractor for background investigations out on the market.  The next coveted role is to work for OPM, directly. Plus, due to USiS&#039;s oustanding performance (maybe this is why USiS is so concerned about its performance!), the company has recently acquired several new contracts, which allows its investigators to receive higher security clearances (only eligible on those particular cases- just like any other job in the work force), which offer variety. 

I think what it comes down to is PASSION.  Do you have a passion for what you do?  Perhaps it&#039;s the flexible hours or the independence that have driven several of these individuals to the role of an investigator.  Or, maybe even the company car... but really...  what it comes down to is PASSION.  It&#039;s passion that will take over when you have to do a residence item at 1900 hours on a dark, chilly evening.  

Okay, I&#039;m off my soapbox.  Yes, there is a fleet charge personal use charge.  But believe me- it&#039;s SO nice to have the Dodge Charger to use instead of having to put miles on my personal car.  Plus, it&#039;s nice to have my company care for the insurance, maintenance, etc etc.  It&#039;s also nice that USiS provides me with the tools I need to complete my job.

Are there areas within USiS that could improve?  Of course.  In reality, no company is without its faults.  Next time, I hope that some of these individuals can really respect what USiS has done for them, over the years.  It made me sad to read these posts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked for USiS for a year and one half, now.  After reading your blog, I have come to the conclusion that everybody likes to complain about certain aspects of the company that were presented in black and white before he or she even accepted the position as an investigator.  The company car, the pay, the hours- those were all presented prior to receiving a face-to-face interview (this included the one-year contract).  I believe that everybody needs to remember that nothing in life is for free.  Yes, like any job, there are aspects that could improve the life of a field investigator with USiS.  The life of a field investigator is not easy:  You have to be self-motivated, a strong listener and writer, intunitive, and willing to go the extra mile.  Yes, the pay is not as high as some jobs (especially in the area in which I work), but it&#8217;s not the lowest on the market, either.  Each and every employee starts at the same base pay, based on one&#8217;s geographical location.  Most employees can expect a pretty decent pay increase (I am only speaking from the experience I have had with my particular district) within one year.  Would I love to make more money?  Of course.  Who wouldn&#8217;t?  There are opportunities for overtime; however, it has to be productive work.  </p>
<p>The role of an investigator compared to that of an &#8220;office job&#8221; is that the time that you &#8220;work&#8221; is really that- it&#8217;s total productive time.  Most &#8220;office workers&#8221; are able to charge a full day&#8217;s work without really doing so.  The role of an investigator is not so- it does not allow one to slack off, because then your metrics will reflect this.</p>
<p>Are the metrics stressful?  Yes, they can be.  I live in one of the busiest areas for security clearances- the Washington, D.C. area.  Our metrics are perhaps the highest for any investigators within the United States.  Are they attainable?  Of course.  It&#8217;s not impossible to make one&#8217;s statistics if he or she is really working the full forty hours.  And not everything is based on stats; there are certain cases that require more time.</p>
<p>For me, USiS is perhaps not a company I&#8217;d like to remain at until I retire (being that I am very young and hope to eventually &#8220;move up&#8221; in the investigative world)&#8230; however, it&#8217;s probably the most stable government contractor for background investigations out on the market.  The next coveted role is to work for OPM, directly. Plus, due to USiS&#8217;s oustanding performance (maybe this is why USiS is so concerned about its performance!), the company has recently acquired several new contracts, which allows its investigators to receive higher security clearances (only eligible on those particular cases- just like any other job in the work force), which offer variety. </p>
<p>I think what it comes down to is PASSION.  Do you have a passion for what you do?  Perhaps it&#8217;s the flexible hours or the independence that have driven several of these individuals to the role of an investigator.  Or, maybe even the company car&#8230; but really&#8230;  what it comes down to is PASSION.  It&#8217;s passion that will take over when you have to do a residence item at 1900 hours on a dark, chilly evening.  </p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m off my soapbox.  Yes, there is a fleet charge personal use charge.  But believe me- it&#8217;s SO nice to have the Dodge Charger to use instead of having to put miles on my personal car.  Plus, it&#8217;s nice to have my company care for the insurance, maintenance, etc etc.  It&#8217;s also nice that USiS provides me with the tools I need to complete my job.</p>
<p>Are there areas within USiS that could improve?  Of course.  In reality, no company is without its faults.  Next time, I hope that some of these individuals can really respect what USiS has done for them, over the years.  It made me sad to read these posts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-14420</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-14420</guid>
		<description>To the former TL and DM with USIS (or any one that has knowledge of this question).  I moved on my own dime (hr said relocation would be covered which it wasn&#039;t) to take a position within USIS. The pay is horrible the stress is etreme for what we get payed.  I am ready to quit and move back home to go back to school.  My question is the agreement that i signed to pay back the money.  How many times have USIS enforced this?  I will not be working for a competitor or any customers of USIS.  I just want to get out of this company before I have a breakdown and have a issue code..  I have only been with the company for 8 months.  Any feedback is greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the former TL and DM with USIS (or any one that has knowledge of this question).  I moved on my own dime (hr said relocation would be covered which it wasn&#8217;t) to take a position within USIS. The pay is horrible the stress is etreme for what we get payed.  I am ready to quit and move back home to go back to school.  My question is the agreement that i signed to pay back the money.  How many times have USIS enforced this?  I will not be working for a competitor or any customers of USIS.  I just want to get out of this company before I have a breakdown and have a issue code..  I have only been with the company for 8 months.  Any feedback is greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-13515</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-13515</guid>
		<description>Bob, 

It might have changed since I left in 5/07,however I was charged $145.00 monthly for the use of a chrysler sebring which was my co car. I know they went to the dodge brand so I dont know if it went up or not. But be aware this comes out of your paycheck, in addition to all the deductions you see. The pay increases were inconsistent and small, promises were made that were not kept. The amount of work v. the amount I was paid was not worth it and the time that you had to dedicate to doing the work did not allow for much of a personal life. On a personal note, I would tell you that during my time w USIS I went on 7 one month long work details and the first five details were with my personal car which made the detail financially worth going on, however the last two were w the co car and I was not reimbursed for the mileage, they were not worth the trouble of going. Hope this helps.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, </p>
<p>It might have changed since I left in 5/07,however I was charged $145.00 monthly for the use of a chrysler sebring which was my co car. I know they went to the dodge brand so I dont know if it went up or not. But be aware this comes out of your paycheck, in addition to all the deductions you see. The pay increases were inconsistent and small, promises were made that were not kept. The amount of work v. the amount I was paid was not worth it and the time that you had to dedicate to doing the work did not allow for much of a personal life. On a personal note, I would tell you that during my time w USIS I went on 7 one month long work details and the first five details were with my personal car which made the detail financially worth going on, however the last two were w the co car and I was not reimbursed for the mileage, they were not worth the trouble of going. Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-13108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-13108</guid>
		<description>I was offered an investigator job with USIS and wondering more specifics from recent or current investigators.  How do you separate work/personal time, pay increases, unexpected expenses (car, etc.), challenges, etc.  So far, I haven&#039;t seen much good regarding management or treatment of employees.  Also it looks like they charge extra for &quot;unlimited&quot; personal use of the company car.  Please e-mail me or post up if you can give me more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was offered an investigator job with USIS and wondering more specifics from recent or current investigators.  How do you separate work/personal time, pay increases, unexpected expenses (car, etc.), challenges, etc.  So far, I haven&#8217;t seen much good regarding management or treatment of employees.  Also it looks like they charge extra for &#8220;unlimited&#8221; personal use of the company car.  Please e-mail me or post up if you can give me more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>I have been in Iraq for the past two and a half years as a LEP Screener, I would like to enter the Field Investigator career when I return to the States. Could anybody suggest any companies or recruiters for me? Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been in Iraq for the past two and a half years as a LEP Screener, I would like to enter the Field Investigator career when I return to the States. Could anybody suggest any companies or recruiters for me? Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-10419</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-10419</guid>
		<description>My advice for you Mike is to try and pick up another contract as I have done. Working as a contractor frees you from the constraints of being a full time employee. I wish you all the luck in the world w USIS, but I need to caution you they will overwork you and underpay you. I agree with the former USIS employee who stated that you he did not think you would have time to do contracting work w MSM and full time w USIS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My advice for you Mike is to try and pick up another contract as I have done. Working as a contractor frees you from the constraints of being a full time employee. I wish you all the luck in the world w USIS, but I need to caution you they will overwork you and underpay you. I agree with the former USIS employee who stated that you he did not think you would have time to do contracting work w MSM and full time w USIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gurn B.</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-10348</link>
		<dc:creator>Gurn B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-10348</guid>
		<description>I am a contract investigator with caci. the pay was slow to start the first 3 months, then the summer was great, now in the fall its slowed again.  I love the work and caci is a good company.  caci has tried to fix some of their management problems with some success, and overall things run pretty smooth. I have spent most of my time recently fixing the mistakes and left behind case work from fired or departed USIS workers.  Its not much fun showing up at a government office and getting an earful about the &quot;usis investigator&quot;.  I have been honeing my verbage for smoothing their concerns and getting these folks clearances back on track.

I run into USIS investigators from time to time, all they have to say is bragging about their company car.  I tell them that caci treats me like an adult who can handle my own vehicle buying and operating.  I get at least 10 times more work done then any of the ones i&#039;ve talked to.

have fun, its a great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a contract investigator with caci. the pay was slow to start the first 3 months, then the summer was great, now in the fall its slowed again.  I love the work and caci is a good company.  caci has tried to fix some of their management problems with some success, and overall things run pretty smooth. I have spent most of my time recently fixing the mistakes and left behind case work from fired or departed USIS workers.  Its not much fun showing up at a government office and getting an earful about the &#8220;usis investigator&#8221;.  I have been honeing my verbage for smoothing their concerns and getting these folks clearances back on track.</p>
<p>I run into USIS investigators from time to time, all they have to say is bragging about their company car.  I tell them that caci treats me like an adult who can handle my own vehicle buying and operating.  I get at least 10 times more work done then any of the ones i&#8217;ve talked to.</p>
<p>have fun, its a great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former USIS Employee</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-9814</link>
		<dc:creator>Former USIS Employee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-9814</guid>
		<description>I am a former USIS investigator, team leader, and district manager (although not in that order - haha!).  Like Jonathan, I was with USIS for 5 years and resigned in 5/2007.  I have since started my own business in the arts field and am much happier than I was at USIS!  

I wanted to respond to Mike&#039;s question about working for USIS and MSM.  A few years ago, USIS changed their policy so that someone can contract to multiple OPM contractors (ie. USIS, MSM, SACI, Kroll), but I do not think you could contract to MSM while employed full time at USIS.  USIS employees are required to inform their District Manager of any outside work and state that it won&#039;t affect their performance.  I don&#039;t know specifically the USIS policy on contracting for another company, but I&#039;ll bet they don&#039;t let you do it.  They would fear that your MSM work would have a negative impact on your USIS work, that it could happen on USIS time, or that you could reveal proprietary information.

On a personal note, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll have time do both!  As an investigator, you&#039;re somewhat at the mercy of your subjects ... you knock on an important source&#039;s door 3 different times, and when they finally call you, you arrange to to out to their house at 7pm that night.  That&#039;s just an example, but it would be hard to have such an unpredictable and busy schedule with both your employer and your contract company.  

Just my 2 cents ... I wish you the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a former USIS investigator, team leader, and district manager (although not in that order &#8211; haha!).  Like Jonathan, I was with USIS for 5 years and resigned in 5/2007.  I have since started my own business in the arts field and am much happier than I was at USIS!  </p>
<p>I wanted to respond to Mike&#8217;s question about working for USIS and MSM.  A few years ago, USIS changed their policy so that someone can contract to multiple OPM contractors (ie. USIS, MSM, SACI, Kroll), but I do not think you could contract to MSM while employed full time at USIS.  USIS employees are required to inform their District Manager of any outside work and state that it won&#8217;t affect their performance.  I don&#8217;t know specifically the USIS policy on contracting for another company, but I&#8217;ll bet they don&#8217;t let you do it.  They would fear that your MSM work would have a negative impact on your USIS work, that it could happen on USIS time, or that you could reveal proprietary information.</p>
<p>On a personal note, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll have time do both!  As an investigator, you&#8217;re somewhat at the mercy of your subjects &#8230; you knock on an important source&#8217;s door 3 different times, and when they finally call you, you arrange to to out to their house at 7pm that night.  That&#8217;s just an example, but it would be hard to have such an unpredictable and busy schedule with both your employer and your contract company.  </p>
<p>Just my 2 cents &#8230; I wish you the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, 

I too have recently signed on to do contract investigations with MSM. MSM is the company sponsoring my top secret clearance investigation. How do you like it so far? Jon, the other thing is that I also accepted a job as an employee investigator with USIS. Are you allowed to work at USIS as an employee and MSM as a contractor. If so, why didn&#039;t you do both. This is my first job out of college..... any advice you can give me would be great! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, </p>
<p>I too have recently signed on to do contract investigations with MSM. MSM is the company sponsoring my top secret clearance investigation. How do you like it so far? Jon, the other thing is that I also accepted a job as an employee investigator with USIS. Are you allowed to work at USIS as an employee and MSM as a contractor. If so, why didn&#8217;t you do both. This is my first job out of college&#8230;.. any advice you can give me would be great! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-9330</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-9330</guid>
		<description>I began working for USIS in Augusta, GA in 08/02 and the starting pay at that time was $26,000.  I worked for USIS until 05/07 when I left to take a position as a contractor with CACI doing OPM investigations. I left USIS making $33,500, and I was an above average investigator. THEY DO NOT give DAMN about their employees and show it by not compensating their employees fairly. I would advise any any person just graduating college that USIS is a place to get started in this field, but not to stay. Since leaving my full time job with USIS and becoming a contractor my stree level has went gone away and I can concentrate on quality and not quantity. despite what any manager at USIS tells you folks, they are concerned with quantity not quality. The second to last month with USIS all investigators in the district were told to conduct five personal interviews per day, and transmit 1000 months of coverage per week, that was the last straw for me. I recently signed another contract with MSM Security in 10/07 to conduct personal investigations for them. I am making more now as a contractor with CACI than I was when I left USIS and MSM will only make me more money. Contracting is the way to go, I wish it would not have taken me five years to get to this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I began working for USIS in Augusta, GA in 08/02 and the starting pay at that time was $26,000.  I worked for USIS until 05/07 when I left to take a position as a contractor with CACI doing OPM investigations. I left USIS making $33,500, and I was an above average investigator. THEY DO NOT give DAMN about their employees and show it by not compensating their employees fairly. I would advise any any person just graduating college that USIS is a place to get started in this field, but not to stay. Since leaving my full time job with USIS and becoming a contractor my stree level has went gone away and I can concentrate on quality and not quantity. despite what any manager at USIS tells you folks, they are concerned with quantity not quality. The second to last month with USIS all investigators in the district were told to conduct five personal interviews per day, and transmit 1000 months of coverage per week, that was the last straw for me. I recently signed another contract with MSM Security in 10/07 to conduct personal investigations for them. I am making more now as a contractor with CACI than I was when I left USIS and MSM will only make me more money. Contracting is the way to go, I wish it would not have taken me five years to get to this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/clearance-applications-not-processed-within-target-times/comment-page-1/#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=10#comment-5059</guid>
		<description>I graduated from college last December and was told about being a contract investigator the month before. The person that told me about the industry told me he loved it. He told me companies and people to contact regarding working as an employee. He worked for USIS for three years, then became a contractor with USIS, Omniplex, and the FBI. 

I contacted Mantech, Omniplex, and USIS. Omniplex offered me an interview then a job in December of 2006. I was excited about my first job out of college, but in February of 2007, I was told that the contract I was supposed to work was cancelled (OPM) and with that, my job was cancelled. After that I received an affer from Mantech, now known as MSM to become a contract investigator and I accepted. Now I am going through the process of receiving a Top Secret Clearance. One month ago, I was told by MSM, that I had been granted an interim secret clearance and soon realized I could not do anything with that. 

The security department now says my investigation is underway, OPM says everything is correct, and the contacts I listed will now be contacted as well as any the investigator learns about during the investigation. The security department is expecting everything to be done by August 1st. I have read some of the other responses in this blog and am not sure what to think. Is it foolish to believe I will have a Top Secret Clearance by 8/1/07? 

Also, any advice regarding good companies to work for on a contract basis would be much appreciated. Once I am working, please give some tips on how to do a good job and be in the companies good graces as a contract investigator. I&#039;m from Maryland if that helps at all! 

Thanks! This site has taught me a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I graduated from college last December and was told about being a contract investigator the month before. The person that told me about the industry told me he loved it. He told me companies and people to contact regarding working as an employee. He worked for USIS for three years, then became a contractor with USIS, Omniplex, and the FBI. </p>
<p>I contacted Mantech, Omniplex, and USIS. Omniplex offered me an interview then a job in December of 2006. I was excited about my first job out of college, but in February of 2007, I was told that the contract I was supposed to work was cancelled (OPM) and with that, my job was cancelled. After that I received an affer from Mantech, now known as MSM to become a contract investigator and I accepted. Now I am going through the process of receiving a Top Secret Clearance. One month ago, I was told by MSM, that I had been granted an interim secret clearance and soon realized I could not do anything with that. </p>
<p>The security department now says my investigation is underway, OPM says everything is correct, and the contacts I listed will now be contacted as well as any the investigator learns about during the investigation. The security department is expecting everything to be done by August 1st. I have read some of the other responses in this blog and am not sure what to think. Is it foolish to believe I will have a Top Secret Clearance by 8/1/07? </p>
<p>Also, any advice regarding good companies to work for on a contract basis would be much appreciated. Once I am working, please give some tips on how to do a good job and be in the companies good graces as a contract investigator. I&#8217;m from Maryland if that helps at all! </p>
<p>Thanks! This site has taught me a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

