<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Security Clearance Question and Answer Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/gettingupdating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service</link>
	<description>Defense jobs, security clearance jobs, and intelligence jobs, industry news, and security clearance advice for the security cleared professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-44929</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=83#comment-44929</guid>
		<description>I ask my cotr about the reinvestigation and he said that he wants as to have a full scope clearing like they do he is IEA/ICE. i told him that we need a SF86 not a SF85P with a 306, 258 etc.  did i do right or did i made fool of my self. he laugh and said we already had a clearing. (I know that we cannot have secret or confidential base on a SF85P.) is that correct?  and if we do, what would it be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ask my cotr about the reinvestigation and he said that he wants as to have a full scope clearing like they do he is IEA/ICE. i told him that we need a SF86 not a SF85P with a 306, 258 etc.  did i do right or did i made fool of my self. he laugh and said we already had a clearing. (I know that we cannot have secret or confidential base on a SF85P.) is that correct?  and if we do, what would it be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BW AN INVESTIGATOR</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-44922</link>
		<dc:creator>BW AN INVESTIGATOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=83#comment-44922</guid>
		<description>Larry,

I know--many of us think the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,</p>
<p>I know&#8211;many of us think the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-44921</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=83#comment-44921</guid>
		<description>BW
 but the questions are already ask on the SF85P. any way thankyou for answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BW<br />
 but the questions are already ask on the SF85P. any way thankyou for answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-44306</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=83#comment-44306</guid>
		<description>William and Team,

When I submitted my question, I was hoping for quality service and a fast turnaround. You did not fail to deliver. You information was very thorough, full of concise details and solid advice. The answers were tailored towards my specific situation and it was obvious that you had done some research on my behalf as well.  

Thank you for your commitment to quality service. It is much appreciated!


Angela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William and Team,</p>
<p>When I submitted my question, I was hoping for quality service and a fast turnaround. You did not fail to deliver. You information was very thorough, full of concise details and solid advice. The answers were tailored towards my specific situation and it was obvious that you had done some research on my behalf as well.  </p>
<p>Thank you for your commitment to quality service. It is much appreciated!</p>
<p>Angela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/getting-updating-a-clearance/new-security-clearance-question-and-answer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-44125</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearancejobsblog.com/?p=83#comment-44125</guid>
		<description>William, et al., 

I just wanted to say thanks for answering my question and for providing a service that is both unique and very helpful!

Regards,

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, et al., </p>
<p>I just wanted to say thanks for answering my question and for providing a service that is both unique and very helpful!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

