When a Clearance Was Granted Despite the Applicant Lying About Cocaine Use
Most of the case examples highlighted on this site are clearance denials upheld by the Defense Office of Hearing and Appeals (DOHA). Here is a good example of a case where the applicant had issues concerning recent cocaine and then lying about it, but was able to mitigate the issues and be granted eligibility for a clearance. Here are the particulars:
The applicant, a former Navy E-5, left the service after several deployments to hostile fire zones and suffered from PTSD. From September 2012 to January 2013 he decided to use cocaine to self-medicate in order to alleviate depression (effects of PTSD). In April 2013 he sought help from a psychiatrist and was given prescription medication that helped him control his anxiety. He subsequently submitted a security clearance application in May 2013, but omitted all information regarding his illegal drug use, and then did not disclose it during the initial interview with the background investigator. It was not until a follow up interview that he confessed to using cocaine. Based on this information he was denied a clearance and rightfully so.
So how did he manage to get a favorable clearance decision from DOHA? In his appeal he provided all of the mitigating factor information that could be applied to the issues of illegal drug use and personal conduct (falsification). The psychiatrist provided a favorable prognosis; the applicant provided a plausible reason for his falsification and drug use, as well as a statement of intent to never use illegal drugs; character references were provided by a variety of reputable sources; and current supervisor and co-workers all provided stellar performance reports and indicated confidence and trust in the applicant. In other words, the applicant checked all the mitigating criteria that enabled the DOHA judge to consider the “whole person” concept, resolve the issues at hand, and grant the clearance.