Security Clearance news
DCSA Updates Periodic Reinvestigation Guidance for Contractors
A recent announcement published by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) reflects changes that will affect all DoD contractors regarding having to submit their SF-86 (soon to be PVQ) updates for periodic reinvestigations. This updated guidance aligns with policy guidance military and government civilian personnel are already following. The
Working for Multiple Employers at the Same Time Lands Contractor in Hot Water
In a rather interesting recent Defense Office of Hearing and Appeals case, a DoD contractor was denied security clearance eligibility due to personal conduct concerns revolving around how he neglected to get approval to work for additional companies and at one point, was employed by three different employers at the
1983bigbass: SEAD6 is CE/CV So go ahead and don’t report it. See how that works out for you. There is no distinction between sf86 and mandatory reporting when you have…
Thesis? Arrogant? I literally stated in this thread that I reported to the FSO? You should probably relax a little bit here. It’ll be ok, I promise.
Interestingly enough: SEAD 3 covers mandatory reporting events SEAD 4 categorizes SEAD 6 governs CE I encourage you to read SEAD 3 and not use search engines that lead back…
You just proved my point. If you already know the answer, why are you asking? I specifically sourced you to what DCSA says is mandatory reporting “Any arrest, regardless of…